English common law courts before judicature acts (common pleas highlghted) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
A “resident” is not the same as an “inhabitant”.
According to Black’s Law Dictionary, First Edition, a “resident”
may not be entitled to all the privileges as an “inhabitant”.
It further states that a resident is “also a tenant…obliged to reside
on his lord’s land”. Whereas a “domicile” is that place where one
sleeps and intends to stay with his family, aka “shelter”, his “residence”
is merely a temporary place from whence he eventually intends to return
to his “domicile”. The domicile is the fruit of his labor while the residence
is a place he has temporarily gone for business, or to make a living,
with the intent of returning to his “shelter”.
The judges are now called “corams” meaning an unelected judge, a person sitting as a judge, but not a judge.
Therefore making the courts liable to uphold not our Common Law, but the civil law of commerce, as practised by this Australian System of Government.
And to doubly keep the People well away from any Common Law, the sea boundaries were extended around Australia, both outward and inward along each State’s coastline – the landmass was now legislatively covered in “water”, thus allowing maritime law to rule in the courts as well.
Under maritime law, the captain of the ship has total lawful control, making all judicial rules. Common Law does not exist at sea.
Now, as the People CAN onlybe arrested, punished, sentenced, etc through Common Law UNLESS they hold a commercial contract with any government “department” or entity – the rise of registration, licensing, certification, etc began in this country.
Suddenly it was a crime to do anything without being given permission from some government agency.
Related articles
- What is Maritime Law and what is its function..?? (shippingandfreightresource.com)
- Zukerkorn — Possible Bad News For Domestic Asset Protection Trusts In Conflict-Of-Laws Dispute (forbes.com)
- Official Announcement From the One People’s Public Trust (americankabuki.blogspot.com)
- IP and the Common Law (lawprofessors.typepad.com)
- POLICE SERVICE, enforcing the corporate policies (peterbdunn.wordpress.com)
- Domicile 4.5 Featured in Siren’s Call! (storiesbywilliams.com)
- The “Common Law Property” Myth in the Libertarian Critique of IP Rights (Part 1) (truthonthemarket.com)
- THE ONE PEOPLES PUBLIC TRUST: Announcement No.2 (wolfke74.wordpress.com)
- Designating common-law spouses as pension beneficiaries crucial after landmark Ontario court ruling (business.financialpost.com)
- THE ONE PEOPLES PUBLIC TRUST: Announcement No.2 (americankabuki.blogspot.com)











i get $725 p/f about 362 a week to live off our servants get $900.00 per day a
huuuugggee difference from master, tax payer, ie wage payer to servant , yet servant rakes in
superior benefits vide wages for sittin on their asses and talking than sweatting like bricklayers or riggers
and others that actually do physical labour and not just jaber with their jaws, for such superior life standards
as opposed to those that poay their wages!!
yep accounting practices for and by accountants/bankers
usurping public from their $ with their creative accounting methodologies
corporations just members of community meeting to make rulst to impose against others in community
imagine if members of a community collected at a pub met and decided to make documents to kick out of the homes and incarcerate
these alledgted servants because we think they scum?
whats the difference anyway corporations or a hotel, fishing or darts club ??
they all just members of a community, meeting, to make paperwork, to inflict upon other community members lives wtf?
and thats whats served up as the australian way of life under clepto corporatocracy fabian socialistic rule
Q would you be able to do a private gem mine – by hand, pick n shouvel & still get your pension..
.say it is hard work n gems $$ not so easy to keep a secret when you sell them
just need a private buyer of your labour
like pollies have done, they using peoples monies, for a corporate plan agains them
pollies, corporations, whats the real difference?
11:29 am (Edit)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_politics
According to the WHO, each human being requires a bare minimum of 20 litres of fresh water per day for basic hygiene;[11] this equals 7.3 cubic metres (about 255 ft3) per person, per year. Based on the availability, access and development of water supplies, the specific usage figures vary widely from country to country, with developed nations having existing systems to treat water for human consumption, and deliver it to every home. At the same time however, some nations across Latin America, parts of Asia, South East Asia, Africa and the Middle East either do not have sufficient water resources or have not developed these or the infrastructure to the levels required. This occurs for many varied reasons. It has resulted in conflict and often results in a reduced level or quantity of fresh water per capita consumption; this situation leads toward disease, and at times, to starvation and death.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_water
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_politics
ICAC seizes on Australian Water’s link to Obeid family
The majority owner of Australian Water, Nick Di Girolamo
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/icac-seizes-on-australian-waters-link-to-obeid-family-20121216-2bhj2.html#ixzz2FHpqngiW
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/icac-seizes-on-australian-waters-link-to-obeid-family-20121216-2bhj2.html#ixzz2FHpcJ2YT
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/icac-seizes-on-australian-waters-link-to-obeid-family-20121216-2bhj2.html
http://www.smh.com.au/business/3-billion-overcharge-on-power-bills-accc-20121024-2846w.html
http://www.smh.com.au/act-news/water-utility-tapped-on-costs-20130401-2h3ff.html
http://www.news.com.au/national-news/nsw-act/sydney-water-discounts-bills-for-3000-customers-who-were-overcharged/story-fndo4bst-1226610425667
Eighty per cent of these customers read their own meters and discovered they were being charged for water they were not using.
Opposition water spokesman Walt Secord is calling on the state government to review Sydney Water’s process in estimating a household’s water usage, and is urging people to do a check of their meters if bills appear too high.
More than 200,000 households receive estimated bills.
“With families facing cost of living pressures and living on tight budgets, it is unfair for them to be paying for water they are not using. Families are doing their part and conserving water, but they need to know they are being charged fairly,” Mr Secord said.
The figures, contained in Sydney Water’s annual report for 2011-2012, show bill complaints have increased by 14 per cent since 2010.
The total number of complaints received by Sydney Water has risen to 7527 from 7398 in 2010-11, with more than half related to bills.
The 2011-2012 report showed that, after tax, Sydney Water made $367 million – $95 million more than forecast in the statement of corporate intent target signed by the Premier and Treasurer.
http://peterbdunn.wordpress.com/2012/09/16/they-gave-me-a-bill-i-asked-to-prove-how-many-litres-of-water-ive-used/
Thanks to ignorant sherrifs Police and Courts I got evicted assaulted all because I complained re exactly what has now come out Compensation Ay !!
Man threatened police with crowbar: court
http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/315362/man-threatened-police-with-crowbar-court/?cs=300
scumbags
http://peterbdunn.wordpress.com/2012/06/27/australian-water-scam-just-like-carbon-tax-scam-alan-jones/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_water
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights
Pingback: The Fall of Australia – Coming Catastrophes in the Australian Economy | peter's space
Pingback: Whats the difference between water and petrol in NSW ? | peter's space