A Legal Lean for $450.00 Evicts Pensioner from Flat with Extreme Prejudice


http://pamea.wordpress.com/2012/06/06/what-is-right-with-nsw-housing/

http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/so-the-nsw-department-of?xg_source=activity

Well after recieving  certian letters from the Now Human Resources Department of NSW (Lands corp)
and ignoring them as my evidence was ignored by  the registrar when i took the department
 before their own tribunal for discrimination, ….eviction was supposed to take place on
 8 may ,2012 but didnt  on, 22 may  after a male being  thrownout of his 3rd storey window


police locked residents in their units re a crime scene out side their front door, then on
the 24th may  2012, about 11.15am, the sherriff arived with a 1st instance warrant 
to evict me and my property, we had a conversation, re water literage, the
 weights and measures legislation, any dollar amount i might owe, and i informed him/them,
 i was prepred to protect my self, my property and my residence for which rent was paid with an
iorn crow bar which i showed them..  They  left my front door for a short time and police attended,
kicked in my front door, pepper sprayed me in the face extricated me from my flat and  threw me in the
rear of a  waiting paddy wagon, wherupon i was transported to a police station untill dark denied
any communication or a phone call, ,then transported to wolongong  untill court the next day where
i  obtained bail for 4 x assault and 1 x  resist police and sherrifs officers.   Later in the  afternoon i
was transported to  silverwater Prison and  at 11.30pm  bailed and released  in to the cold and rain
to catch a train to central thence to wollongong. so ive lost my little flat the residents are protesting
re their acess and egress being denied re   being fenced in,  a petitioin has been submitted but we 
shall see what happenns  next after 10 july 2012 wollongong court .  :-/

Racketeering is a treasanous Activity against the interests of the communal population of an area
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason
Treason against the king was known as high treason and treason against a lesser superior was petty treason. A person who commits treason is known in law as a traitor.

Oran’s Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as “…[a]…citizen’s actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation].” In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavour.

Outside legal spheres, the word “traitor” may also be used to describe a person who betrays (or is accused of betraying) their own political party, nation, family, friends, ethnic group, team, religion, social class, or other group to which they may belong.

http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/maintop/view/inforce/act+40+1900+cd+0+N

545B Intimidation or annoyance by violence or otherwise

(1) Whosoever:
(a) with a view to compel any other person to abstain from doing or to do any act which such other person has a legal right to do or abstain from doing, or
(b) in consequence of such other person having done any act which he had a legal right to do, or of his having abstained from doing any act which he had a legal right to abstain from doing,
wrongfully and without legal authority:
(i) uses violence or intimidation to or toward such other person or his wife, child, or dependant, or does any injury to him or to his wife, child, or dependant, or
(ii) follows such other person about from place to place, or
(iii) hides any tools, clothes, or other property owned or used by such other person, or deprives him of or hinders him in the use thereof, or
(iv) (Repealed)
(v) follows such other person with two or more other persons in a disorderly manner in or through any street, road, or public place,
is liable, on conviction before the Local Court, to imprisonment for 2 years, or to a fine of 50 penalty units, or both.
(2) In this section:
Intimidation means the causing of a reasonable apprehension of injury to a person or to any member of his family or to any of his dependants, or of violence or damage to any person or property, and intimidate has a corresponding meaning.

Injury includes any injury to a person in respect of his property, business, occupation, employment, or other source of income, and also includes any actionable wrong of any nature.

This entry was posted in Computers and Internet, Education, News and politics, Organizations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

29 Responses to A Legal Lean for $450.00 Evicts Pensioner from Flat with Extreme Prejudice

  1. pamea says:

    Will These Pan Out the Same..

    Click to access Waterusagecharges.pdf

    http://www.tenants.org.au/publish/factsheet-23-utilities/
    Also Guide Lines:

    Click to access WaterUsageChargingMinisterialGuidelines.pdf

    — better use of money.. have the Tennant Pay — so Government can pay for NEW RESIDENTS
    to be built FOR MANY NEW COMERS… See the file..
    listed as update 6 days ago)
    Quote –
    ”Tenants of Housing NSW and the Aboriginal Housing Office are required to pay for their water usage. This charge is in addition to the tenant’s rent. Tenants do not pay for connection, sewerage and other charges not related to water usage.

    If you are a public housing tenant you will pay either a ‘percentage water charge’ or an ‘actual water charge’. This is determined by whether your property has a shared or a separate water meter and whether Housing NSW receives sufficient usage information from the local water authority to determine your water usage.”

  2. pamea says:

    OUTH Australia’s water-billing system needs to be overhauled, according to a prominent academic.

    He said the reform is necessary in order to give asset-rich, income-poor older people some relief.

    “The system linking land value to bills was designed to share the burden according to income and wealth, but it’s no longer working as people have seen their retirement incomes eroded by the global financial crisis,” the executive director of the Australian Institute for Social Research, Associate Professor John Spoehr, said.

    “People may be asset rich but they might also be income poor and such bills become a very difficult burden.
    “Any review of pricing policy needs to focus on the most vulnerable.”
    SEE MORE: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/users-hit-out-at-unfair-water-bills/story-e6frea83-1226180362147

  3. A First Instance Warrant was used to enable my eviction in front of my neighbours as , in my opinion , a warning to other residents that similar would happen to them if they also protested and stopped paying their guestimated water chagres , even though our servants have $41 Million to upgrade public housing state wide NSW and the Illawaras portion is $11 Mill , but for Some Reason they dont want to place water meters in some 63 units?? So they can continue charging people twice for water ,. ! rent is calculated by adding Water rates and Land rates together and divided by the number of payments per annumn to arrive at a figure that can be adjusted by 10% re market conditions, so if my water is already calculated in my Rent,…. and my rent was paid ,…. Why wasnt i shown the 1st instant warrant ,? or my questions as to how compliance to the Weights and measures Legislation is being complied with , when Lynda Burney ammends legislation and takes out the requirements for metered bills to suit their continued racketeering process under the noses of their masters! You and Me ! An its all up pther on teh Govts own website check the Residential tennancy act and see for your self the ammendments made, when and by who. Dont believe Me !!

    Click to access Waterusagecharges.pdf

    http://www.tenants.org.au/publish/factsheet-23-utilities/
    Also Guide Lines:

    Click to access WaterUsageChargingMinisterialGuidelines.pdf

  4. oHH my protest against my Landlord started way back kwith this lot….

    Record ;-/

  5. more interesting information here ,.
    .an excellent video released by Koozzoo Media, highlighting the risks associated with full body scanners.

    http://www.truthnews.com.au/web/radio/story/exposing_the_criminal_injustice_system_with_george_georgios

    In the second hour George Georgios returns to talk about the systemic injustice and corruption within the criminal justice system. George has many insights into this subject based on in depth interviews with both prison inmates and judicial authorities.

  6. PeterBDunn says:

    see also
    Episode 230 – Social Engineering 101

    http://www.corbettreport.com/episode-230-social-engineering-101/

    Time Reference: 02:19

    Interview 514 – William Hathaway on Radical Peace
    Time Reference: 02:45

    http://au.news.yahoo.com/today-tonight/video/watch/29659651/power-price-disgrace/

  7. In California, the law imposes a statute of limitations, which sets a maximum amount of time that legal proceedings can occur after the date the incident. Each year at our Law Office, people call me to ask me for help that have legitimate cases, only to find their statute of limitations has run out. It is one of the most difficult things for me to tell them I can’t help because they waited too long. I have been a Personal Injury Lawyer for 25 years. Please call me for help and advice if you have suffered from a personal injury. I am here to help.

  8. PeterBDunn says:

    and some more information and links…….
    http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm

    In 1847 the London Communist League (Karl Marx and Frederick Engels)
    used Hegel’s theory of the dialectic to back up their economic theory of communism.
    Now, in the 21st century, Hegelian-Marxist thinking affects our entire social and political structure.
    The Hegelian dialectic is the framework for guiding our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead us
    to a predetermined solution. If we do not understand how the Hegelian dialectic shapes our perceptions
    of the world, then we do not know how we are helping to implement the vision. When we remain locked into
    dialectical thinking, we cannot see out of the box.

    Hegel’s dialectic is the tool which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thought and action.
    Every time we fight for or defend against an ideology we are playing a necessary role in Marx and Engels’
    grand design to advance humanity into a dictatorship of the proletariat. The synthetic Hegelian solution to
    all these conflicts can’t be introduced unless we all take a side that will advance the agenda. The Marxist’s
    global agenda is moving along at breakneck speed. The only way to completely stop the privacy invasions,
    expanding domestic police powers, land grabs, insane wars against inanimate objects (and transient verbs),
    covert actions, and outright assaults on individual liberty, is to step outside the dialectic. This releases us from the
    limitations of controlled and guided thought.

    THE CARBON TAX FRAUD. Professor Bob Carter.
    http://www.freestatevoice.com.au/politics/item/728-the-carbon-tax-fraud-professor-bob-carter

    http://australianpolitics.com/text/53.shtml

    Australian Constitution – Section 53 – Powers of the Houses in respect of legislation
    Proposed laws appropriating revenue or moneys, or imposing taxation, shall not originate in the Senate. But a proposed law shall not be taken to appropriate revenue or moneys, or to impose taxation, by reason only of its containing provisions for the imposition or appropriation of fines or other pecuniary penalties, or for the demand or payment or appropriation of fees for licences, or fees for services under the proposed law.

    The Senate may not amend proposed laws imposing taxation, or proposed laws appropriating revenue or moneys for the ordinary annual services of the Government.

    The Senate may not amend any proposed law so as to increase any proposed charge or burden on the people.

    Weights and Measures (National Standards) Regulations
    http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2004L00578
    See section 80 …

  9. PeterBDunn says:

    Water water everywhere , the floods in Qld NSW and more recentley koo wee ( i saw that on the telly tonight ) the Minister gives 3 X Sydney harbour fulls of water fo forign power companies whilst our medicare fees are consumed by christmas island inhabitants our manufacturing industries disapearing moving off shoe ( I wonder Why Carbon tax?) and our public servants attend a magistrate swear out a 1st instance warrant to evict a disabled pensioner for an alledged $450.00 water bill wheni had $300.00 rent credits ,.. so what did I really Oswe and I lost my Residence for ? What Reason Tyrranical actions by servants who ignore their own mission statements statements of Values and Oaths of office?? Huh
    “There is no Greater tyranny, than that which
    is perpetrated under the shield of law and
    in the name of justice.” ~ Montesquieu ~

    http://corporatemediaexposed.com/
    Sec Semper Tyrranas

  10. PeterBDunn says:

    Alex Jones and Max Keiser “Occupy Bilderberg Movement Mission On Press TV

    In this edition of the show Max interviews Alex Jones form infowars.com.
    He talks about the Occupy Bilderberg movement and its mainstream media attention;
    What the mission is? Where does it go from here? Monsanto, Water Scams and corporate takeovers
    /Dictatorships/Facism,,,…

  11. PeterBDunn says:

    this should be a blog all on its own ,..
    The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the
    second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become
    the legalized version of the first.” Thomas Jefferson

    “The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether
    man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite.” Thomas Jefferson

    http://australianpolitics.com/text/53.shtml

    Australian Constitution – Section 53 – Powers of the Houses in respect of legislation
    Proposed laws appropriating revenue or moneys, or imposing taxation, shall not originate in the Senate.
    But a proposed law shall not be taken to appropriate revenue or moneys, or to impose taxation,
    by reason only of its containing provisions for the imposition or appropriation of fines or other pecuniary penalties,
    or for the demand or payment or appropriation of fees for licences, or fees for services under the proposed law.

    The Senate may not amend proposed laws imposing taxation, or proposed laws appropriating revenue or moneys for
    the ordinary annual services of the Government.

    The Senate may not amend any proposed law so as to increase any proposed charge or burden on the people.

    Weights and Measures (National Standards) Regulations
    http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2004L00578
    See section 77 onward …

    and we let our servants get us into debt without any responsibility ? what is a duty of care ?

    • PeterBDunn says:

      http://www.forbesadvocate.com.au/story/1982732/water-rate-concerns/?cs=719

      Water Rate Concerns
      By Danielle Buckley
      Dec. 19, 2013, 10:29 a.m.

      Pensioners from a community housing block in Forbes have voiced their outrage at the water rates they are being charged by Housing NSW.

      The housing block, located in north Forbes, is made up of 13 one bedroom units, where tenants each currently pay $9 per fortnight.

      Tony Higgins has been a tenant in the block for 18 months and he believes that this amount is almost three times more than other community housing water rates.

      “Others in community housing pay just $3.10 per fortnight which means they pay only $80.60 per year per house and we pay $234 per year per unit for the same water,” he said.

      “I’m just upset about paying three times more than what Housing NSW are being charged themselves.”

      While the Forbes Shire Council set the water rates for the town, they charge Housing NSW who in turn bill their tenants

      Current Housing NSW tenancy agreements declare that the water rate is set at 4.7 per cent of tenants rent, up to a maximum of $7.

      Yet at this rate, the pensioners are paying more than the Shire Council are charging Housing NSW.

      Mr Higgins is frustrated with this and believes that as tenants of community housing, their discounted rent should not mean they pay more for water and other amenities.

      “With our consumption under the shire council’s water rates we should have paid $790 for the past 12 months, instead we have paid a staggering $3042,” he said.

      “In my opinion, community housing should not be trying to recuperate some of the subsidy that we’re getting as pensioners in water rates,” he said.

      While the water rate charged by Housing NSW is set and therefore consumption should not alter the water bill, a spokesperson for the Department of Family and Community Services said if charges are high it is because of excess usage.

      “Tenants are responsible for excess water usage but Family and Community Services does not apply any additional administrative charges on top of this,” the spokesperson said.

      “Some tenants receive higher bills than they expect, but this is generally found to be due to them maintaining a garden or having a large family.”

      Yet neither Mr Higgins, nor any of the other tenants have families and as Mr Higgins explains, none of the tenants are avid gardeners.

      mail.forbesadvocate@ruralpress.com

      http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/icac-target-nick-di-girolamo-paid-himself-a-salary-of-more-than-1-million-a-year-at-australia-water-holdings/story-fni0cx12-1226855280693

      ICAC target Nick Di Girolamo was paying himself a salary of more than $1 million a year at Australian Water Holdings while the firm was on the brink of collapse.

      The businessman’s company also donated $67,637 to the Liberal and National Parties from 2008 to 2011 as it sought to resolve a contract dispute with Sydney Water despite Treasury advice saying it had “net assets worth $36”.
      ICAC, which will begin hearings into Australian Water Holdings on Monday, announced it would broaden its inquiries to look at Mr Di Girolamo’s salary and that of other AWH executives.
      Mr Di Girolamo was eventually forced out of the company in April 2013 with “a token payment” after he had the firm take a $5 million loan from four business people and was unable to pay it back, The Daily Telegraph can reveal.

  12. PeterBDunn says:

    lessor = dept housing /Human Services(NSW lands corp) Lessee = community member

    lessee informs lessor of new tennant.

    lessor contacts lessee by phone then sends required paperwork for lessee and new tennant to fill out,
    income statements pension numbers ect.

    lessee and new tennant comply and fill out all paper work alledgedley required.

    lessor contacts lessee again by phone and more paper work sent out which was completed and
    returned by lessee and new tennant s per requirements

    lessor contacts lessee and enquires re duplication of information oh his desk and askes lessee who organised duplication
    but as documents not signed information unable to be supplied

    rebekkah on lessors behalf rings lessee on a friday afternoon(31/8/12) and intimates lessee owes an amount in rent

    as lessor recieved allo paperwork sent in june 2012 and did not contact lesse in required 28 days of recieving documents
    required re new tennants information this, as a matter of coursem intimates to lessee, that lessor is content happy with
    arrangements, submitted vide paperwork to lessor, upon request as per requirements, and any adjustements to rent
    should be sent to lessee, by lessor, vide normal paperwork channells.

    new tennant on lessees behalf attends centerlink and informs them of lessees situation with her lessor
    new tennant at centerlink office is informed by public servants that state members of the public service
    are unable to send documents between state and federal public servants ( one arm of government just different branches)
    even when lesse and new tennant have signed documents in past giving the dept of housing and centerlink permission to share information
    in relation to tennants/clients situations.

    Best Practice, Duty of care, their individual governmental department Mission Statements and Statements Of Values

  13. PeterBDunn says:

    http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/maintop/view/inforce/act+40+1900+cd+0+N

    545B Intimidation or annoyance by violence or otherwise

    (1) Whosoever:
    (a) with a view to compel any other person to abstain from doing or to do any act which such other person has a legal right to do or abstain from doing, or
    (b) in consequence of such other person having done any act which he had a legal right to do, or of his having abstained from doing any act which he had a legal right to abstain from doing,
    wrongfully and without legal authority:
    (i) uses violence or intimidation to or toward such other person or his wife, child, or dependant, or does any injury to him or to his wife, child, or dependant, or
    (ii) follows such other person about from place to place, or
    (iii) hides any tools, clothes, or other property owned or used by such other person, or deprives him of or hinders him in the use thereof, or
    (iv) (Repealed)
    (v) follows such other person with two or more other persons in a disorderly manner in or through any street, road, or public place,
    is liable, on conviction before the Local Court, to imprisonment for 2 years, or to a fine of 50 penalty units, or both.
    (2) In this section:
    Intimidation means the causing of a reasonable apprehension of injury to a person or to any member of his family or to any of his dependants, or of violence or damage to any person or property, and intimidate has a corresponding meaning.

    Injury includes any injury to a person in respect of his property, business, occupation, employment, or other source of income, and also includes any actionable wrong of any nature.

    http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/d&ta01.htm
    Democracy & Treason in Australia

    Global Governance – Part 1 … Club of Rome and Agenda 21 Explained

    Big Brothers Thought Police Deny me a meal for 2nd time

    I went to My local Community hall for Lunch Was refused a meal and arrested

    They Deny You Service Then Send You a Bill

    The Minister Gives Water Away to Overseas Power Companies But Tennants Must Pay

    My Records Of Discrimination and Inaction by Public Servants

  14. Pingback: A government agency broke rules at least 634 times in the last financial year | peter's space

  15. Pingback: WHICH CORPORATIONS DID WHAT IN CONTRAVENTION TO GENEVA CONVENTIONS | peter's space

  16. pamea says:

    Man ruled over man to his peril .. I am paying full price for water .. Yet have to buy drinking water 80Cents a litre
    astate police department s protect them from unarmed protesters … :—. I ave pain doctors cannot diagonize .. Older pic servants find themselves unemployed.. Little chance of more work thousands of gas well ruining good soil&water Cents while

  17. Pingback: The Adgenda 21 unfolding in my Area. | peter's space

  18. PeterBDunn says:

    http://www.smh.com.au/business/3-billion-overcharge-on-power-bills-accc-20121024-2846w.html

    http://www.smh.com.au/act-news/water-utility-tapped-on-costs-20130401-2h3ff.html

    http://www.news.com.au/national-news/nsw-act/sydney-water-discounts-bills-for-3000-customers-who-were-overcharged/story-fndo4bst-1226610425667

    Eighty per cent of these customers read their own meters and discovered they were being charged for water they were not using.

    Opposition water spokesman Walt Secord is calling on the state government to review Sydney Water’s process in estimating a household’s water usage, and is urging people to do a check of their meters if bills appear too high.

    More than 200,000 households receive estimated bills.

    “With families facing cost of living pressures and living on tight budgets, it is unfair for them to be paying for water they are not using. Families are doing their part and conserving water, but they need to know they are being charged fairly,” Mr Secord said.

    The figures, contained in Sydney Water’s annual report for 2011-2012, show bill complaints have increased by 14 per cent since 2010.

    The total number of complaints received by Sydney Water has risen to 7527 from 7398 in 2010-11, with more than half related to bills.

    The 2011-2012 report showed that, after tax, Sydney Water made $367 million – $95 million more than forecast in the statement of corporate intent target signed by the Premier and Treasurer.

    They Gave Me a Bill I asked to Prove How many Litres of Water Ive used?


    Thanks to ignorant sherrifs Police and Courts I got evicted assaulted all because I complained re exactly what has now come out Compensation Ay !!
    Man threatened police with crowbar: court
    http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/315362/man-threatened-police-with-crowbar-court/?cs=300
    scumbags

    Australian Water Scam Just like Carbon Tax Scam-Alan Jones-

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_water
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights

  19. PeterBDunn says:

    http://news.ninemsn.com.au/health/2009/09/16/13/00/showering-can-make-us-sick-scientists

    Showering can make us sick: scientists

    Scientists from the University of Colorado have revealed the warm, damp, enclosed conditions of showerheads are the perfect breeding ground for mycobacterium avium — one of the pathogens responsible for causing respiratory illnesses.

    The findings also showed the water coming through the showerhead vaporised the bacteria in tiny water droplets, making it easier for people to breathe it deep into their lungs.

    Molecular biologist Norman Pace said the findings were a serious public health concern.

    “How many people do you know with a shallow cough? Probably a lot (and) I would bet that in a lot of cases mycobacterium avium is responsible,” he said.

    “(Showering is) like anything else — there is a risk associated with it.”

    “If you are immune compromised or are susceptible to pulmonary infections, take a bath instead of a shower,” she said.

    “If you are healthy and your immune system is functioning properly, you should not worry about the germs in your showerhead.”

    The study showed plastic showerheads were more likely to develop biofilms of germs than steel ones.

  20. PeterBDunn says:

    http://fairdinkumradio.com/?q=rss.xml

    Ep 448 Freemen Thinking Out Loud
    Simon joins us to discuss some of the latest developments in the Freeman Movement, and the concepts of Common Law and Natural Law.

    Is this a law abiding system? Is there a remedy in law? Many a strong researcher has unraveled the layers of the system to reveal it’s mechanics. It is indeed a system of slavery, hearkening back to Babylon. The natural desire of individuals is to be free. It is only natural then to be attracted to remedies that offer freedom or the ability simply to live in peace.

    Today we’re going to look a little at how our natural rights have been removed, and how much good we can expect from using the system to fight the system. A whole movement has sprung up around individual sovereignty through knowledge of law often called the “Freeman movement”. There is much allure to using hidden knowledge of this systems rules to restore our individual sovereignty and distance ourselves from unfair contracts.

    We examine some leading Freeman thinker’s in Dean Clifford, Schaeffer Cox and Kevin Annett and their latest moves, imprisonment and calls to action.

    14.03.06 Freemen Thinking.mp3

  21. PeterBDunn says:

    http://www.forbesadvocate.com.au/story/1982732/water-rate-concerns/?cs=719

    Water Rate Concerns
    By Danielle Buckley
    Dec. 19, 2013, 10:29 a.m.

    Pensioners from a community housing block in Forbes have voiced their outrage at the water rates they are being charged by Housing NSW.

    The housing block, located in north Forbes, is made up of 13 one bedroom units, where tenants each currently pay $9 per fortnight.

    Tony Higgins has been a tenant in the block for 18 months and he believes that this amount is almost three times more than other community housing water rates.

    “Others in community housing pay just $3.10 per fortnight which means they pay only $80.60 per year per house and we pay $234 per year per unit for the same water,” he said.

    “I’m just upset about paying three times more than what Housing NSW are being charged themselves.”

    While the Forbes Shire Council set the water rates for the town, they charge Housing NSW who in turn bill their tenants

    Current Housing NSW tenancy agreements declare that the water rate is set at 4.7 per cent of tenants rent, up to a maximum of $7.

    Yet at this rate, the pensioners are paying more than the Shire Council are charging Housing NSW.

    Mr Higgins is frustrated with this and believes that as tenants of community housing, their discounted rent should not mean they pay more for water and other amenities.

    “With our consumption under the shire council’s water rates we should have paid $790 for the past 12 months, instead we have paid a staggering $3042,” he said.

    “In my opinion, community housing should not be trying to recuperate some of the subsidy that we’re getting as pensioners in water rates,” he said.

    While the water rate charged by Housing NSW is set and therefore consumption should not alter the water bill, a spokesperson for the Department of Family and Community Services said if charges are high it is because of excess usage.

    “Tenants are responsible for excess water usage but Family and Community Services does not apply any additional administrative charges on top of this,” the spokesperson said.

    “Some tenants receive higher bills than they expect, but this is generally found to be due to them maintaining a garden or having a large family.”

    Yet neither Mr Higgins, nor any of the other tenants have families and as Mr Higgins explains, none of the tenants are avid gardeners.

    mail.forbesadvocate@ruralpress.com

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/icac-target-nick-di-girolamo-paid-himself-a-salary-of-more-than-1-million-a-year-at-australia-water-holdings/story-fni0cx12-1226855280693

    ICAC target Nick Di Girolamo was paying himself a salary of more than $1 million a year at Australian Water Holdings while the firm was on the brink of collapse.

    The businessman’s company also donated $67,637 to the Liberal and National Parties from 2008 to 2011 as it sought to resolve a contract dispute with Sydney Water despite Treasury advice saying it had “net assets worth $36”.
    ICAC, which will begin hearings into Australian Water Holdings on Monday, announced it would broaden its inquiries to look at Mr Di Girolamo’s salary and that of other AWH executives.
    Mr Di Girolamo was eventually forced out of the company in April 2013 with “a token payment” after he had the firm take a $5 million loan from four business people and was unable to pay it back, The Daily Telegraph can reveal.

  22. PeterBDunn says:

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/icac-inquiry-australian-water-holdings-living-the-high-life-on-the-public-purse/story-fni0cx12-1226858629392

    A $10,000 corporate box at the football, limousines and political party donations.

    These were just some of the big spending, as well as wages, which Australian Water Holdings then billed back to Sydney Water as expenses, a corruption inquiry heard yesterday.

    The money tap had been turned on for the company that had won a lucrative deed of contract to provide water infrastructure in Sydney’s north west but the ICAC heard yesterday that Sydney Water was rebuffed when it attempted to clarify what exactly it was paying for.

    LIBERAL FUNDRAISER DI GIROLAMO ‘WAS PAID $250,000’

    The inquiry is examining explosive claims that figures from both sides of politics were engaged with AWH CEO Nick Di Girolamo during his attempts to secure a lucrative public private partnership with the successive Liberal and Labor government that could have secured AWH shareholders up to $200 million.

    ICAC heard yesterday that Mr Di Girolamo was to be paid $1.25 million a year for coming on board as a co-director of Australian Water — a fee that was to be reimbursed by Sydney Water due to the long running deed.

    But it was not the only bill being paid by Sydney Water.

    Records of AWH payments tabled in ICAC show that in 2009 and 2010 AWH also paid more than $66,000 in monthly $7333 payments to the company Eight by Five.

    The next ICAC inquiry will investigate whether it is an alleged slush fund connected to the former Liberal minister Chris Hartcher.

    The documents also show $6585 worth of payments to the Italian Chamber of Commerce in 2009, of which Mr Di Girolamo was a prominent member. Australian Water Holdings even billed Sydney Water for more than $250,000 in legal fees which it was using to fund its own legal dispute with Sydney Water over payments that the government agency labelled “extraordinarily high

  23. PeterBDunn says:

    Hey Australia Wake up and follow the money…

    Banks make $71 million profit – a day

    DateJune 24, 2013
    http://www.smh.com.au/business/banks-make-71-million-profit–a-day-20130623-2oqrw.html

    Big banks eye $10bn profit for the half
    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/big-banks-eye-10bn-profit-for-the-half/story-e6frg8zx-1226897547320#

    CBA soars as profit jumps
    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/cba-soars-as-profit-jumps/story-e6frg8zx-1226918033006#

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/police-minister-michael-gallacher-accused-of-colluding-in-corrupt-political-donations-scheme/story-fni0cx12-1226903166316

    Police minister Michael Gallacher accused of colluding in corrupt political donations scheme

    Alicia Wood & Andrew Clennell
    The Daily Telegraph
    May 02, 2014 11:32PM

    POLICE Minister Mike Gallacher has been forced by Premier Mike Baird to resign over sensational ICAC allegations he masterminded a “corrupt scheme” to raise illegal political donations in concert with a company part-owned by mining entrepreneur Nathan Tinkler.

    In a phone call at 3.15pm yesterday from Canberra, Mr Baird insisted to Mr Gallacher that he had to go.

    Police Politicians the court system Who can you trust any of em ?

  24. Pingback: Australian Weights and Mesures Information for you and yours | peter's space

  25. PeterBDunn says:

    http://www.msn.com/en-au/money/markets/australia-a-paradise-for-corporate-crooks-says-regulator/ar-BBayK6V?ocid=mailsignout

    The Australian Securities and Investments Commission chairman, Greg Medcraft, told journalists at a Walkley Foundation function that “Australia is a paradise for white collar crime.”

    “[In] most countries the penalties are two to three times the amount gained or lost,” he told the function.

    “Often [in] Australia it’s actually worthwhile breaking the law to do the trade. You can’t have that.”

    The corporate watchdog is under fire and accused of not doing enough to crack down on financial planning scandals at the big banks and for being too soft on big business.

Leave a reply to PeterBDunn Cancel reply